Speaking Out For Family Law Reform

Paragraph 6

Paragraph 5

Paragraph 2

Paragraph 3

Paragraph 2

Paragraph 7

Paragraph 8

Paragraph 7

Paragraph 3

“MEP has told me that I can enforce on my own and they will not kick me out again”. This is a direct quote from an email from my ex-wife, Angela Rose Power, to me on March 9, 2017. 

notice Angela’s statement  are defamatory, libelous and, for the most part easily disproved lies. Nowhere does she seek funds or act in anything other than an ethically reprehensible manner. What further proof does the NS Department of Justice need to make them see that they have enabled a vigilante? 


I have, in my possession, two letters that Ms. Power wrote to the Danish immigration authority that reflect the level of anger and hatred Ms. Power has for me. These documents illustrate the delusions, lies, misrepresentation of facts, and conjecture that Ms. Power promotes as fact with what appear to be the express intent to defame, discredit and cause harm to my family and me.
 
But, NS Maintenance Enforcement would never allow such an inappropriate and potentially illegal behavior, would they? Certainly, the Director would be aware of the social and ethical implication of such a breech in mandate and authority? There is evidence that suggests that this government agency may not always behave appropriately, particularly in this instance, where Angela Power has an interesting history with NS Maintenance Enforcement.

Angela Power was kicked out of the program in 2014 for her interference and her efforts to influence the actions of the NS Maintenance Enforcement Program. Subsequently, Ms. Power claims to have been re-admitted to the program through extensive lobbying on her own behalf, and a review by the provincial ombudsman. Her re-admission, according to her, was conditional on her ceasing her attempts to influence and enforce, and agreeing to adhere to the rules and guidelines established for the program. I still have not received formal notice of such a re-admission or the proceedings leading up to this alleged action.

On February 25, 2016, Angela Rose Power contacted Danish Immigration. I have attached the statement she provided to Danish Authority, and the intent is clearly malicious. This document is riddled with fantasy and speculation. The outright lies, fabrication and conjecture are all presented as fact and the only truthful statements in the document are in paragraph 3.

I have attached Angela Powers February 25th correspondence to Danish Immigration. In her statement she makes many false, accusatory, defamatory and misleading statements and weaves lies, innuendo, and assumption with partial few facts to create the illusion of truth credibility.​​

Paragraph 1

Paragraph 4

Why would Angela Power engage Danish Immigration with such a story when one simple fact would have sufficed? Certainly, she has self justified her behaviour and probably believes the fantasy she is building and telling.


We have seen Angela Power's nature exposed when she is challenged, as in her response to Robert Napolintano after she attempted to intimidate my past employer to action. Over time, her behaviour has exposed her true nature . You can read this eye opening exchange here.

A masked Angela Power intimidating a child at her school event

Vigilante Justice: A Practice Supported By Nova Scotia Maintenance Enforcement?

Angela Power follows up with Danish Immigration on October 6, 2016. This letter really highlights the delusions and fantasy world in which Angela Power lives. She doubles down and expands upon her fantasy and lies presented in her original correspondence but, of a more frightening nature, are the unsubstantiated creative conspiracy theories she presents. I have to admit, I am very impressed by the creativity of the individual she describes. But, it sure as heck is not me she is describing. 

On a number of past occasions, MEP has shown how they tend to operate outside of their established boundaries, but if Angela Power is telling the truth, this situation extends far beyond the grey areas and into sanctioned vigilantism. A practice of enabling and allowing potentially angry and emotionally involved ex-spouses to act with impunity is in fact vigilantism. Many divorced readers will easily see how grossly inappropriate this behavior would be. In fact, one of the mandates of the Maintenance Enforcement program is to act as an intermediary to prevent this type of behavior.

Angela Power appears to have adopted the position of immunity reflected in her statement “MEP has told me that I can enforce on my own and they will not kick me out again”. She is campaigning and promoting a mythical story, vilifying me and my family. She is misrepresenting facts and legal positions to further portray me as a monster, without apparent intent to enforce. 


​I’ve described Angela Power’s vigilante actions and demonstrate how she continues to operate with intent to extract revenge and retribution. You will                        Angela'a

Paragraph 4

Paragraph 6

Paragraph 5

Copyright © 2017 FamilyLawReform.ca. All rights reserved.

Angela Power, delivering ‘justice’ through fear and intimidation from behind a mask.

Paragraph 1